Google Translate Disclaimer

A number of pages on the Government of Saskatchewan's website have been professionally translated in French. These translations are identified by a yellow box in the right or left rail that resembles the link below. The home page for French-language content on this site can be found at:

Renseignements en Français

Where an official translation is not available, Google™ Translate can be used. Google™ Translate is a free online language translation service that can translate text and web pages into different languages. Translations are made available to increase access to Government of Saskatchewan content for populations whose first language is not English.

Software-based translations do not approach the fluency of a native speaker or possess the skill of a professional translator. The translation should not be considered exact, and may include incorrect or offensive language. The Government of Saskatchewan does not warrant the accuracy, reliability or timeliness of any information translated by this system. Some files or items cannot be translated, including graphs, photos and other file formats such as portable document formats (PDFs).

Any person or entities that rely on information obtained from the system does so at his or her own risk. Government of Saskatchewan is not responsible for any damage or issues that may possibly result from using translated website content. If you have any questions about Google™ Translate, please visit: Google™ Translate FAQs.

Livestock Water Quality

A number of factors affect the quality of surface water sources. Nutrient loading from spring or summer run-off, little to no re-charge from a dry spring/summer, animal impact from direct cattle watering, and sub-surface soil or water salinity are but a few of the possibilities.

Many dugouts located in saline areas may be fed from the bottom with saline ground water. These dugouts may also be fed by spring run-off, which can impact both quantity and quality of the water. The water in these dugouts may have naturally high mineral levels to start with and, without fresh water recharge (as well as summer evaporation causing mineral concentration), producers may find the mineral content in the water elevates to levels that are not suitable for use by fall. The only way to determine the mineral content of these water sources is to have water tests done by a lab.

Tables 1 and 2 provide levels of some parameters and consequent effects on livestock.

Table 1.Total Dissolved Solids interpretation chart for livestock use

Total Dissolved Solids (TDS)

Water content (mg/L or ppm)

Usefulness for cattle, sheep, or horses

<1000 - 3000

Acceptable

3,000-5,000*

Generally Acceptable; Requires further mineral analysis
May cause diarrhea 
May reduce performance, reduce growth and affect health of ruminants

5,000-7,000

Poor
Likely to cause diarrhea
Avoid use for pregnant and/or lactating cows
Test for sulphates

Reduced animal performance

7,000-10,000

Potentially unsuitable – unfit for young, pregnant or lactating cattle
Sulphates likely high

Negative effects in all animal classes

Further mineral analysis required

>10,000 Unsuitable

Table 2. Sulphate interpretation chart for livestock use

Sulphates (SO4) Measured as SO4

Water content (mg/L or ppm)

<500

Good

500-1,000

Good
Diarrhea or refusal of water by animals not accustomed to it
500 to 800 mg/L may affect calves, inducing a trace mineral deficiency
Trace mineral deficiencies can cause depressed growth rate, depressed fertility and depressed immune response
Decreased performance in feedlot cattle
1,000 mg/L recommended maximum if feed level is high in sulphates or if ambient temperature is high

1,000-1,500

Acceptable
Laxative
Performance reduced
High levels of sulphates can also contribute to copper and other trace mineral deficiencies

1,500-2,000

Poor

Chelated or Hydroxy minerals may be required

High chance of trace mineral deficiency

Symptoms include: decreased gains, depressed immunity and reduced conception, etc.

Sporadic cases of polio possible

2,000 mg/L> can cause diarrhea and reduced milk production in dairy cows

>2,000

Unsuitable
Sporadic cases of polio are highly probable
Performance reduced
Scours likely
Greater than 4,000 mg/L dangerous health problems expected

In general, the tolerance of animals to sulphates in water depends on total dietary intake of sulphate and will depend on the levels in feed and total water consumption. Total water consumption will be influenced by environmental temperatures, moisture levels in feed and stage of production. There is also the opportunity for cattle to become accustomed to sulphates, as rumen microflora can slowly shift over time. It is recommended that this tolerance not be relied upon when making management decisions.

Elevated water sulphates have been shown to also negatively impact growth and performance of cattle. A trial done by Loneragan et al. (2001) fed backgrounding cattle water with varying amounts of sulphates. When introduced to a water source containing varying levels of sulphates, cattle fed water approaching 2,000 mg/L sulphates gained 19 per cent less weight (0.9 lbs/day less) during the first 28 days on that water source compared to cattle introduced to water that had only 200 mg/L sulphates.

Lab testing is the single best way to test for dissolved minerals including sulphates, conductivity and Total Dissolved Solids (TDS). Handheld conductivity meters have been increasing in popularity and can be a useful screening tool when working properly. Field testing in 2017 by Livestock and Feed Extension Specialists demonstrated the following considerations when using handheld meters:

  • Meters must be tested against lab results to maintain accuracy;
  • Meters/probes have lifespans and should be replaced according to manufacturer specifications; and
  • Conversion factors used to calculate TDS from conductivity can be misleading. Commonly these meters are calibrated to estimate TDS at 67 per cent of conductivity when 2017 testing (n=555) demonstrated TDS was on average 89 per cent of conductivity.

Water Consumption Requirements and Sources

If trucking or piping water becomes a necessity, the following are some guidelines for drinking water requirements for various sizes of animals. These will be useful when trying to determine the size of water storage required. Keep in mind that water requirements increase at higher temperatures.

  • Cows: 67.5 L (15 gallons) for nursing cows; 54 L (12 gallons) for bred dry cows and heifers.
  • Bulls: 54 L (12 gallons).
  • Growing cattle: 45 L (8 gallons) for 400 lb. animal; 45 L (10 gallons) for 600 lb.; 54 L (12 gallons) for 800 lb.
  • Finishing cattle: 85.5 L (19 gallons) for 400 to 1,200 lb. animal.

Keeping stock physically out of the water source will increase the water available, as well as increase the quality of the water. There are a number of ways to accomplish this, but no perfect system fits all situations. Some viable options may include:

Access Ramps Improves access and preserves slopes on water site and will limit nutrients entering from manure and urine. Some improvement in quality is likely to occur.

Nose Pumps

Animals will need to learn how to use this system. Need one pump for every 25 to 30 animals. May need more than are recommended by the manufacturer. 

Gravity Flow Reservoirs

Requires some excavation to build. Not suited to all sites, as water must flow downhill from water source to trough.

Solar Pumping Stations

Works in remote locations. Requires storage batteries and water storage.

Windmills 

Works in remote locations and requires little maintenance. High variability in winds means that water storage is necessary.

Every individual watering site may have characteristics that make it more suitable to one system than another. As a result, consultation with a Livestock and Feed Extension Specialists is a good idea prior to developing alternative systems. These systems will have benefits in subsequent years through better quality water and longer watering site lifespan.

Summary

If you encounter poor quality water, the following options may be considered:

  • Switch to a source of better quality water, or use the better quality water to dilute the minerals in the poor water; you must be aware of the quality of both sites;
  • If your herd is large enough, it may be less costly (per cow per year) in the long run to look into installation of a water treatment system;
  • Depending on the mineral levels, make use of poorer quality water at certain parts of the year or with certain classes of animals that are less affected; and
  • Make use of the Farm and Ranch Water Infrastructure Program to help with pasture pipelines, new water infrastructure (wells or dugouts) or through expanding an existing dugout of known good water quality.

Staff in the Ministry of Agriculture Regional Offices can assist with interpretation of water test results and provide information on management and program funding options.